I began my day by resuming the realignment of population-density ASCII file which was 20% done on Monday. It took me approx. 3-3.5 hours to realign approx 80% of the file. The some error occurred, application closed suddenly and I lost all that data.
So, moral of the story that I spent approx 5 hours in that file and finally nothing in hand.
Then instead of restarting the process, I tried to find the solution through shell scripting to convert comma delimited file to space delimited. Fortunately I found one and then I converted that file into realigned ASCII file in 5 minutes (:D) through Unix Command.
Now, we have all the aligned data-set for approx 230 m cell size. On one computer I am creating the final dataset for GARP and its still under process. It may take more 30-40 minutes but I wont be here by then so I have left instruction to save that data, once processed by Desktop Garp Manager, on Sid's computer (as I won't be here tomorrow).
I also started the GARP model with 6 files (of 230 m cell size) approx. 40 minutes ago and its still running. It has not given even a single result out of 5 results. It creates a doubt. I am not sure what will happen when I will run the model with 23 files and how much time its going to take.
Chagas_Fall-2013
Wednesday, October 16, 2013
Tuesday, October 8, 2013
Shikher-Today
I began my day with data processing and then discussed about video with the team. After that I wasted 1-2 hours because of the abnormal behavior of ArcGis. Finally, I started using James' computer and it was working fine there. I think I shall have to use some other computer from now onwards, because we were facing the same problem in the last term. I don't know why it happens sometimes with Arc on my computer.
I have started re-sampling of data to approx 230 m resolution. Desktop GARP takes approx 3 minutes per re-sampled ASCII file to convert into RAW file, so its not that bad. Arc takes 15-20 minutes to give resampled ASCII file.
If would be good if we can clip some more area. I will talk about this on Friday. I have created tool in ArcGis to perform re-sampling and conversion to ASCII in single step.
I am running test-case with two re-sampled layers in GARP. It took approx. 10 minutes to produce one probability map with 2 input layers, still 4 more to go. So I think it won't be bad with 10-20 probability maps and 23 input layers.
I have started re-sampling of data to approx 230 m resolution. Desktop GARP takes approx 3 minutes per re-sampled ASCII file to convert into RAW file, so its not that bad. Arc takes 15-20 minutes to give resampled ASCII file.
If would be good if we can clip some more area. I will talk about this on Friday. I have created tool in ArcGis to perform re-sampling and conversion to ASCII in single step.
I am running test-case with two re-sampled layers in GARP. It took approx. 10 minutes to produce one probability map with 2 input layers, still 4 more to go. So I think it won't be bad with 10-20 probability maps and 23 input layers.
Wednesday, October 2, 2013
Shikher-Today
I did following tasks today:
Good news is that now everything looks fine and I don't think there is any problem with the functioning of Desktop GARP. Now, we can experiment as much as we want with the dataset like:
- Rectified the misalignment problem with the population desity ASCII file.
- Resampled the land cover data according to other parameters.
- Ran the GARP model with minimum option to test. It was successful.
- Now, I am running the GARP model with standard options for one species. Its still running. It took 3 hours to finish 33% of simulation.
- Worked on Tech Paper.
Good news is that now everything looks fine and I don't think there is any problem with the functioning of Desktop GARP. Now, we can experiment as much as we want with the dataset like:
- Trying different resolution dataset.
- Trying different variables.
- Trying different study area.
- Trying different species.
- Trying various option given in Desktop GRAP.
Wednesday, September 25, 2013
Hi Team, Hi Walt! ----- I don't know if Joe's PSRD edits ever came back, but we did some minor editing on the deliverable today. I plan to go ahead and upload that one to the exchange before COB tomorrow just to make the deadline; however, Walt mentioned replacing it Friday with a more revised version. Also, from SSC tomorrow I plan to get started drafting the weekly quad chart (Walt this is mostly for you, but I did get a picture of James working diligently on coordinates today!!) Thank you James for all your hard work on that - and Sid for all your work on the deliverable - and Shikher thank you for all your work on data processing. See you all next week. :-)
Tuesday, September 24, 2013
Shikher - Today
I finished processing of all input parameters except land cover. I was learning land cover classification implementation and now I am all set to begin downloading and processing landsat imagery for creating land cover raster for out study area.
I shall come on Friday instead of tomorrow if Walt agrees because I shall frequently need guidance and advise of Walt during the process of land cover raster creation.
I shall come on Friday instead of tomorrow if Walt agrees because I shall frequently need guidance and advise of Walt during the process of land cover raster creation.
Thursday, September 19, 2013
Shikher-Today
I started my day with literature review. Then Sid gave me a link to website for data download and fortunately I found all data (i.e. all 20 parameters except topographic index) in that website. I have downloaded the data.
Then, I was trying to figure out how to merge two raster in ArcGis. Finally I figured it out. Now, I am hoping to finish data processing by tomorrow using ArcGis. After that we only need Reservoir Distribution data to run the model.
Then, I was trying to figure out how to merge two raster in ArcGis. Finally I figured it out. Now, I am hoping to finish data processing by tomorrow using ArcGis. After that we only need Reservoir Distribution data to run the model.
Monday, September 16, 2013
Cha-Cha Chagas :-)
Hi team. I just wanted to take a moment to say it was nice meeting most of you today. Some of you not so much - because I had already met you before! haha. Seems like you all have a lot of great ideas and have your scientific minds on a great path for this project. I look forward to working more closely with you throughout the term. :-) -amber
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)